<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>cmart&#39;s Bleats on cmart&#39;s blog</title>
    <link>https://cmart.blog/bleats/</link>
    <description>Recent content in cmart&#39;s Bleats on cmart&#39;s blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 10:43:36 -0700</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://cmart.blog/bleats/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title></title>
      <link>https://cmart.blog/bleats/6/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 10:43:36 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://cmart.blog/bleats/6/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Dumb startup idea: rent an old shipping store with many cubby holes or lock boxes. The product you sell is Tech Vacations. Customer brings in all their devices, leaves them in a box, and receives a loaner &amp;rsquo;emergency phone&amp;rsquo; that can only call 911 (and perhaps a few pre-programmed emergency contacts). No browser, no texting, no apps. The vacationer gets to enjoy a day or a weekend free from notifications and temptations to scroll. Biggest cost is probably 24/7 security for the store full of customers&amp;rsquo; phones.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title></title>
      <link>https://cmart.blog/bleats/5/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 16:03:21 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://cmart.blog/bleats/5/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;How much time do dogs spend uncomfortably needing to poop? I expect many humans would agree with this statement: &amp;ldquo;If I need to wait more than a few minutes for a place where I can poop, it&amp;rsquo;s often uncomfortable and sometimes painful.&amp;rdquo; It seems reasonable that other mammals would have a similar experience. Given that many/most dogs spend at least part of the day alone, with the sanctioned poop spot behind a door they cannot open without help from a presently-absent human, are these dogs having a good time? (Corollary, why don&amp;rsquo;t we give dogs litter boxes?)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title></title>
      <link>https://cmart.blog/bleats/4/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 16:57:51 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://cmart.blog/bleats/4/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;When computering outside the home, instead of a cafe, consider a counter-service restaurant with booths. You get a larger table surface, a more comfy seat, generally better food options, and later open hours than a typical cafe. Counter service means the staff don&amp;rsquo;t bother you every few minutes and aren&amp;rsquo;t likely to care how long you stay.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title></title>
      <link>https://cmart.blog/bleats/3/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 14:00:18 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://cmart.blog/bleats/3/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;After &lt;a href=&#34;https://cmart.blog/bleats/2&#34;&gt;noticing&lt;/a&gt; that browsers don&amp;rsquo;t have a &amp;lsquo;make this tab dumb and static&amp;rsquo; button, I found &lt;a href=&#34;https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/single-file/&#34;&gt;SingleFile&lt;/a&gt;: a Mozilla-recommended extension that gets very close. It builds a single HTML file capturing a tab&amp;rsquo;s complete rendered DOM (including images) and writes it to the downloads folder. If you enable the &amp;ldquo;open saved pages in a new tab&amp;rdquo; option, you see the static page as soon as it&amp;rsquo;s saved. At first I didn&amp;rsquo;t like the idea of many HTML files cluttering my downloads folder, but then I realized this &amp;ldquo;exhaust&amp;rdquo; doubles as a simple, zero-infra web archive and search engine! Just search your downloads folder.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title></title>
      <link>https://cmart.blog/bleats/2/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 13:21:04 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://cmart.blog/bleats/2/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;del&gt;Firefox&lt;/del&gt; all major browsers &lt;a href=&#34;https://assistant.kagi.com/chat/a50d0a97-eacb-42e8-b63c-3a06f0b8be29&#34;&gt;don&amp;rsquo;t seem to have a mechanism&lt;/a&gt; to stop execution of scripts in a tab while allowing continued scrolling of already-rendered content. You can pause execution in the debugger, but this fades content under an un-scrollable &amp;ldquo;Debugger paused&amp;rdquo; modal. The feature I want is: &lt;em&gt;make this tab dumb and static&lt;/em&gt;. Similar use case as &lt;a href=&#34;https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/firefox-reader-view-clutter-free-web-pages&#34;&gt;Reader View&lt;/a&gt; but more reliable (no fragile heuristics trying to identify the main content). Does the attention economy want this feature to not exist? I grant it would break lazy loading and infinite scrolling. Still worth having IMO.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title></title>
      <link>https://cmart.blog/bleats/1/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://cmart.blog/bleats/1/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Baaa! This is a bleat. Sometimes I want to put a few sentences on the internet without crowding out my longer, higher-effort posts, or having to think of a title. So, I made a new section for them. Bleats have a &lt;a href=&#34;http://localhost:1313/subscribe/#parasocial-subscription&#34;&gt;separate RSS feed&lt;/a&gt; from the main blog.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
